SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS by TYPE
    • Passive Bookshelf Speakers
    • Passive Floor-standing Speakers
    • Passive Center Channel Speakers
    • Passive In-wall Speakers
    • All Passive Speakers
    • Powered Subwoofers
    • Powered Stereo Speakers
  • AMPLIFIERS
  • SMART FIND

KEF Q650c vs KEF R2c Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

KEF Q650c

Passive Center Channel | 64-28k Hz

KEF Q650c
CHECK PRICE
Change
    
KEF R2c

Passive Center Channel | 74-28k Hz

KEF R2c
CHECK PRICE
KEF Q650c KEF Q650c
See at AMAZON
KEF R2c KEF R2c
See at AMAZON
KEF Q650c
See at AMAZON
KEF R2c
See at AMAZON
KEF Q650c vs KEF R2c Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing Q650c and R2c, two Passive Center Channel speakers by KEF

Let's have a brief look at the main features of KEF Q650c and KEF R2c first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

KEF Q650c Key Specs

  • 2-way Design
  • 11th Generation Uni-Q Driver
  • 1" Dome Tweeter
  • 2 x 6.5" aluminum Woofer
  • 64-28k Hz Frequency Response
  • 87 dB Sensitivity
  • Impedance: 8ohms
  • Power Range:15-150watts
  • Weight:13.64kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 212.0" x 24-13/16" x 11-15/16"( 212.0 x 631.0 x 304.0mm )

KEF R2c Key Specs

  • 3-way Design
  • 1" Dome Tweeter
  • 5" Midrange
  • 2 x 5.25" Hybrid Aluminum Woofer
  • 5" Midrange
  • 74-28k Hz Frequency Response
  • 87 dB Sensitivity
  • Impedance: 8ohms
  • Power Range:15-200watts
  • Weight:16.90kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 177.0" x 21-11/16" x 12-7/16"( 177.0 x 551.0 x 316.0mm )

What size room are the KEF Q650c and KEF R2c speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* KEF Q650c KEF R2c
Near-field Poor Poor
Small Room Average Average
Mid-size Room Good Good
Large Room Average Average
Very Large Room Poor Poor

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

In the following sections, we will get into more detail in order to better understand how the KEF Q650c and KEF R2c compare and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one of these loudspeakers is the better choice for you.


**This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


Drivers

One of the fundamental differences between these two speakers is that Q650c is a 2-way design whereas the R2c is a 3-way speaker. 3-way designs utilize a midrange driver in addition to the tweeter and woofer on 2-way designs. Designing a crossover for a 3-way speaker is a complicated process and generally increases the overall cost of the speaker.

Driver KEF Q650c KEF R2c
Driver Setup 2-way 3-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange - 1 x 5-inch
Woofer 2 x 6.5-inch 2 x 5.25-inch

Q650c features a 1" vented aluminum Dome Tweeter and 2 x 6.5" aluminum Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 2500Hz. On the other hand, the R2c features a 1" aluminum Dome Tweeter , a 5" Midrange and 2 x 5.25" Hybrid Aluminum Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 400Hz and 2900Hz.

Frequency Response

Q650c has a frequency range of 64-28k Hz whereas R2c has a frequency range of 74-28k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 64Hz, the Q650c can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the R2c's min frequency of 74Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Center Channel class in our database.

Low Frequency

Center Channel Speakers

Q650c
R2c
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Center Channel Speakers

KEF Q650c
KEF R2c
Min
Average
Max

None of these speakers achieves full range experience which is commonly agreed as 20Hz-20kHz. In order to achieve lower lows / deeper bass, we recommend you pair these with a subwoofer. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

Q650c and R2c have the same Impedance of 8 ohms and their sensitivity is also same at 87 dB.

Sensitivity

Center Channel Speakers

Q650c
R2c
Min
Average
Max

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. While using an amplifier within this range ensures the nominal performance , inputting a power that is higher than the max wattage can result in a damaged speaker.

Q650c can handle a max power of 200 watts RMS from the amp the whereas Q650c has a max power handling value of 150 watts RMS , 50 watts less than the R2c.

Keep in mind that a higher max power handling value doesn't necessarily make that a louder speaker compared to a lower max handling speaker. Loudness or the sound level is also impacted by parameters such as Impedance, sensitivity and system efficiencies.

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

R2c features Binding post posts which make bi-amping or bi-wiring possible. Q650c has a Binding post which doesn't feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

KEF Q650c Terminals
KEF Q650c's Binding post terminals

KEF R2c Terminals
KEF R2c's Binding post terminals allows Bi-amping or bi-wiring

Physical Specs

Size of a speaker can sometimes become an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare KEF Q650c's and KEF R2c's external dimensions. KEF Q650c has external dimensions of 212.0 x 631.0 x 304.0mm ( 8-5/16 x 24-13/16 x 11-15/16inch) whereas KEF R2c has external dimensions of 177.0 x 551.0 x 316.0mm ( 6-15/16 x 21-11/16 x 12-7/16inch) .

KEF R2c is 80mm narrower and 35mm shorter than KEF Q650c but it is also 12mm deeper.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the KEF Q650c is approximately 1918.2cm2 / 297.3inch2 and base area of the KEF R2c is approximately 1741.2cm2 / 269.9inch2. The Q650c requires 10% more surface area than the R2c which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The KEF Q650c weighs 13.64kg / 30lbs and the KEF R2c weighs 16.90kg / 37.2lbs. This makes the R2c 24% heavier than the Q650c.

Here is a comparison of how Q650c and R2c's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Center Channel class.

Weight
All Center Channel Speakers
KEF Q650c
KEF R2c
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of KEF Q650c?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of Q650c:
  • Center-channel loudspeaker
  • 4 Self-adhesive rubber feet
  • Owners Manual
  • Warranty Information
  • What's in the Box of KEF R2c?

    Here are the items that come with the R2c:
  • Center-channel loudspeaker
  • Grille
  • 4 Self-adhesive rubber feet
  • User Manual
  • Warranty Information

  • Reasons to choose KEF Q650c over KEF R2c
    Minimum Impedance 4.2 ohms vs 3.2 ohms Very low impedance levels puts more pressure on amplifier
    Woofer Size 6.5 inches vs 5.25 inches Larger woofer
    Low Frequency Response 64 Hz vs 74 Hz Generates deeper bass
    Passive Radiator one 6.5-inch vs None Increases the bass performance
    Price per pair* 750USD vs 1300USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

    Reasons to choose KEF R2c over KEF Q650c

    Max Input Power 200 watts vs 150 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
    Driver Setup 3-way vs 2-way Have a dedicated mid-range driver
    Height 177mm vs 212mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
    Base Surface Area 1741cm2 vs 1918cm2 Takes less floor space
    KEF Q650c vs KEF R2c Specs Table
    Detailed comparison of specifications
    General KEF Q650c KEF R2c
    Brand KEF KEF
    Speaker Type Center channel speaker Center channel speaker
    Power Range 15-150 watts 15-200 watts
    Sensitivity 87 dB 87 dB
    Impedance 8 ohms 8 ohms
    Impedance 4.2 ohms 3.2 ohms
    Frequency Response 64-28k Hz 74-28k Hz
    Drivers
    Woofer Quantity 2 2
    Woofer Size 6.5" 5.25"
    Woofer Composition aluminum Hybrid Aluminum
    Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
    Tweeter Size 1" 1"
    Tweeter Type Dome Dome
    Aimable Tweeter No No
    Midrange Driver No 5"
    Crossover Frequency 2500Hz 400Hz and 2900Hz
    Firing Direction n/a rear
    Physical Specs
    Height 212.0mm (8.3") 177.0mm (7")
    Width 631.0mm (24.8") 551.0mm (21.7")
    Depth 304.0mm (12") 316.0mm (12.4")
    Weight 13.64kg (30lbs) 16.90kg (37.2lbs)
    Enclosure Passive Radiator Acoustic Suspension
    Available Colors Satin White, Satin Black, Walnut Black Gloss, White Gloss, Walnut
    Grille optional Yes
    Moisture Resistancy No No
    Connections
    Biamp Inputs n/a Yes
    Other
    Parts Warranty 5 Years 5 Years
    Labor Warranty 5 Years 5 Years

    Most Popular Speakers
    Klipsch Reference R-51M
    Klipsch R-51M
    2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
    Wharfedale Elysian 2
    Wharfedale Elysian 2
    3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
    ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
    ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
    2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
    Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
    B&W 606 S2
    2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
    KEF Q150
    KEF Q150
    2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
    Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
    Klipsch RP-500M
    2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
    Wharfedale EVO4.1
    Wharfedale EVO4.1
    2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
    Bowers & Wilkins 606
    B&W 606
    2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
    Copyright © 2025 by SpeakerDecision
    About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

    Report a Correction