In this review, we will be comparing Studio 620 and RP-400M, two Passive Bookshelf speakers from JBL and Klipsch.
Let's have a brief look at the main features
of JBL Studio 620 and Klipsch RP-400M first before getting into our more
detailed comparison.
JBL Studio 620 Key Specs
- 2-way Design
- 1" High Frequency Compression Tweeter
- 5.25" PolyPlas Woofer
- 50-40k Hz Frequency Response
- 84 dB Sensitivity
- Impedance: 6ohms
- Power Range:up to 100watts
- Weight:6.88kg
- Dimensions (H x W x D): 312.0" x 7-1/2" x 9-1/2"( 190 x 240 x 312mm )
Klipsch RP-400M Key Specs
- 2-way Design
- 1" Tractrix Horn Tweeter
- 4" Cerametallic Woofer
- 52-25k Hz Frequency Response
- 93 dB Sensitivity
- Impedance: 8ohms
- Power Range:up to 50watts
- Weight:4.10kg
- Dimensions (H x W x D): 298.0" x 5.6" x 7.5"( 298.0 x 144.0 x 191.0mm )
What size room are the JBL Studio 620 and Klipsch RP-400M speakers good for?
The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision
factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size
and max power parameters:
| Listening Environment* |
JBL Studio 620 |
Klipsch RP-400M |
| Near-field |
Average |
Good |
| Small Room |
Good |
Good |
| Mid-size Room |
Average |
Average |
| Large Room |
Poor |
Poor |
| Very Large Room |
Bad |
No way |
(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2,
Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: >
400 sq. ft / 36 m2.
Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual
listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening
position, speaker locations, etc.)
In the following sections, we will get into more detail in order to better understand how the JBL Studio 620 and Klipsch RP-400M compare and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one of these loudspeakers is the better choice for you.
**This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking
through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Drivers
Both Studio 620 and RP-400M are 2-way speakers.
| Driver |
JBL Studio 620 |
Klipsch RP-400M |
|
Driver Setup
|
2-way
|
2-way
|
|
Tweeter
|
1-inch
|
1-inch
|
|
Midrange
|
- |
- |
|
Woofer
|
1 x 5.25-inch
|
1 x 4-inch
|
Studio 620 features a 1" High Frequency Compression Tweeter and 1 x 5.25" PolyPlas Woofer . On the other hand, the RP-400M features a 1" Tractrix Horn Tweeter and 1 x 4" Cerametallic Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 1500Hz.
Frequency Response
Studio 620 has a frequency range of 50-40k Hz whereas RP-400M has a frequency range of 52-25k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 50Hz, the Studio 620 can go slightly deeper then the RP-400M's min frequency of 52Hz.
Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Bookshelf class in our database.
Low Frequency
Bookshelf Speakers
High Frequency
Bookshelf Speakers
None of these speakers achieves full range experience which is commonly agreed as 20Hz-20kHz. In order to achieve lower lows / deeper bass, we recommend you pair these with a subwoofer. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.
Impedance and Sensitivity
Studio 620 is a 6 ohms speaker compared to the RP-400M which has a nominal impedance of 8 ohms.
These two speakers also have different sensitivity levels. Studio 620 sensitivity is rated at 84 dB and the RP-400M's is rated at 93 dB. This 9 dB difference makes the Klipsch RP-400M a more sensitive speaker compared to JBL Studio 620, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.
Sensitivity
Bookshelf Speakers
Power Range
Power
range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. While using
an amplifier within this range ensures the nominal performance , inputting a power that is higher than the
max wattage can result in a damaged speaker.
Studio 620 can handle a max power of 100 watts RMS from the amp the whereas RP-400M has a max power handling value of 50 watts RMS, 50 watts less than the Studio 620.
Keep in mind that a higher max power handling value doesn't necessarily make that a louder speaker
compared to a lower max handling speaker. Loudness or the sound level is also impacted by parameters
such as Impedance, sensitivity and system efficiencies.
Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring
Studio 620 features Single binding posts type posts and RP-400M has a Single binding posts type posts. None of these speakers feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.
Klipsch RP-400M's Single binding posts terminals
Cabinet Type and Port Position
Both Studio 620 and RP-400M have rear firing ports. Rear ported speakers generally need more room between the backside of the speaker and the wall compared to sealed and front/bottom ported speakers. Placing the speakers too close to the walls may cause the bass to sound boomy.
If you are limited in space and can't get the speakers away from the backwall, check our Speakers with Front Firing Ports page.
Klipsch RP-400M Tractrix horn-shaped Port
Physical Specs
Size of a speaker can sometimes become an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare JBL Studio 620's and Klipsch RP-400M's external dimensions. JBL Studio 620 has external dimensions of 190 x 240 x 312mm ( 12.3 x 7-1/2inch x 9-1/2inch ) whereas Klipsch RP-400M has external dimensions of 298.0 x 144.0 x 191.0mm ( 11.7 x 5.6 x 7.5inch) .
JBL Studio 620 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 46mm wider, 14mm taller and 49mm deeper than Klipsch RP-400M.
Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited.
The base surface area of the JBL Studio 620 is approximately 456.0cm2 / 70.7inch2 and base area of the Klipsch RP-400M is approximately 275.0cm2 / 42.6inch2. The Studio 620 requires 66% more surface area than the RP-400M which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.