In this review, we will be comparing Studio 620 and 606 S2 AE, two Passive Bookshelf speakers from JBL and Bowers Wilkins.
Let's have a brief look at the main features
of JBL Studio 620 and B&W 606 S2 first before getting into our more
detailed comparison.
JBL Studio 620 Key Specs
- 2-way Design
- 1" High Frequency Compression Tweeter
- 5.25" PolyPlas Woofer
- 50-40k Hz Frequency Response
- 84 dB Sensitivity
- Impedance: 6ohms
- Power Range:up to 100watts
- Weight:6.88kg
- Dimensions (H x W x D): 312.0" x 7-1/2" x 9-1/2"( 190 x 240 x 312mm )
B&W 606 S2 Key Specs
- 2-way Design
- 1" Decoupled Double Dome Tweeter
- 6.5" Continuum Woofer
- 52-28k Hz Frequency Response
- 88 dB Sensitivity
- Impedance: 8ohms
- Power Range:30-120watts
- Weight:6.90kg
- Dimensions (H x W x D): 347.0" x 7-1/2" x 12-13/16"( 347.0 x 191.0 x 326.0mm )
What size room are the JBL Studio 620 and B&W 606 S2 speakers good for?
The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision
factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size
and max power parameters:
| Listening Environment* |
JBL Studio 620 |
B&W 606 S2 |
| Near-field |
Average |
Poor |
| Small Room |
Good |
Average |
| Mid-size Room |
Average |
Good |
| Large Room |
Poor |
Average |
| Very Large Room |
Bad |
Poor |
(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2,
Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: >
400 sq. ft / 36 m2.
Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual
listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening
position, speaker locations, etc.)
In the following sections, we will get into more detail in order to better understand how the JBL Studio 620 and B&W 606 S2 compare and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one of these loudspeakers is the better choice for you.
**This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking
through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Drivers
Both Studio 620 and 606 S2 AE are 2-way speakers.
| Driver |
JBL Studio 620 |
B&W 606 S2 |
|
Driver Setup
|
2-way
|
2-way
|
|
Tweeter
|
1-inch
|
1-inch
|
|
Midrange
|
- |
- |
|
Woofer
|
1 x 5.25-inch
|
1 x 6.5-inch
|
Studio 620 features a 1" High Frequency Compression Tweeter and 1 x 5.25" PolyPlas Woofer . On the other hand, the 606 S2 AE features a 1" Aluminum Decoupled Double Dome Tweeter and 1 x 6.5" Continuum Woofer .
Frequency Response
Studio 620 has a frequency range of 50-40k Hz whereas 606 S2 AE has a frequency range of 52-28k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 50Hz, the Studio 620 can go slightly deeper then the 606 S2 AE's min frequency of 52Hz.
Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Bookshelf class in our database.
Low Frequency
Bookshelf Speakers
High Frequency
Bookshelf Speakers
None of these speakers achieves full range experience which is commonly agreed as 20Hz-20kHz. In order to achieve lower lows / deeper bass, we recommend you pair these with a subwoofer. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.
Impedance and Sensitivity
Studio 620 is a 6 ohms speaker compared to the 606 S2 AE which has a nominal impedance of 8 ohms.
These two speakers also have different sensitivity levels. Studio 620 sensitivity is rated at 84 dB and the 606 S2 AE's is rated at 88 dB. This 4 dB difference makes the B&W 606 S2 a more sensitive speaker compared to JBL Studio 620, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.
Sensitivity
Bookshelf Speakers
Power Range
Power
range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. While using
an amplifier within this range ensures the nominal performance , inputting a power that is higher than the
max wattage can result in a damaged speaker.
Studio 620 can handle a max power of 120 watts RMS from the amp the whereas Studio 620 has a max power handling value of 100 watts RMS , 20 watts less than the 606 S2 AE.
Keep in mind that a higher max power handling value doesn't necessarily make that a louder speaker
compared to a lower max handling speaker. Loudness or the sound level is also impacted by parameters
such as Impedance, sensitivity and system efficiencies.
Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring
606 S2 AE features Binding post posts which make bi-amping or bi-wiring possible. Studio 620 has a 5-Way post which doesn't feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.
B&W 606 S2's Binding post terminals allows Bi-amping or bi-wiring
Cabinet Type and Port Position
Both Studio 620 and 606 S2 AE have rear firing ports. Rear ported speakers generally need more room between the backside of the speaker and the wall compared to sealed and front/bottom ported speakers. Placing the speakers too close to the walls may cause the bass to sound boomy.
If you are limited in space and can't get the speakers away from the backwall, check our Speakers with Front Firing Ports page.
Physical Specs
Size of a speaker can sometimes become an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare JBL Studio 620's and B&W 606 S2's external dimensions. JBL Studio 620 has external dimensions of 190 x 240 x 312mm ( 12.3 x 7-1/2inch x 9-1/2inch ) whereas B&W 606 S2 has external dimensions of 347.0 x 191.0 x 326.0mm ( 13-5/8 x 7-1/2 x 12-13/16inch) .
B&W 606 S2 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 1mm wider, 35mm taller and 86mm deeper than JBL Studio 620.
Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited.
The base surface area of the JBL Studio 620 is approximately 456.0cm2 / 70.7inch2 and base area of the B&W 606 S2 is approximately 622.7cm2 / 96.5inch2. The Studio 620 requires 27% less surface area than the 606 S2 AE which gives it a small advantage on placement in tight spaces.