SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS by TYPE
    • Passive Bookshelf Speakers
    • Passive Floor-standing Speakers
    • Passive Center Channel Speakers
    • Passive In-wall Speakers
    • All Passive Speakers
    • Powered Subwoofers
    • Powered Stereo Speakers
  • AMPLIFIERS
  • SMART FIND
SVS SB-2000 vs Klipsch SPL-100 Comparison
x
Subwoofer to replace
Change

SVS SB-2000

Powered Subwoofer | 19-220 Hz

SVS SB-2000
CHECK PRICE
Change
    
Klipsch SPL-100

Powered Subwoofer | 27-125 Hz

Klipsch SPL-100
CHECK PRICE
SVS SB-2000 SVS SB-2000
See at AMAZON
Klipsch SPL-100 Klipsch SPL-100
See at AMAZON
SVS SB-2000
See at AMAZON
Klipsch SPL-100
See at AMAZON
SVS SB-2000 vs Klipsch SPL-100 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing SB-2000 and SPL-100, two Powered Subwoofer speakers from SVS and Klipsch. Being Powered subwoofers, they both have built-in amplifiers so you don't need an external power amp or an integrated amp to power them. Let's have a brief look at the main features of SVS SB-2000 and Klipsch SPL-100 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

SVS SB-2000 Key Specs

  • 12" Aluminum Woofer
  • 19-220 Hz Frequency Response
  • 500 watts Max Amplifier Output
  • Weight:15.82kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 372.0" x 14-1/4" x 18-13/16"( 372.0 x 362.0 x 478.0mm )

Klipsch SPL-100 Key Specs

  • 10" Cerametallic Woofer
  • 27-125 Hz Frequency Response
  • 200 watts Max Amplifier Output
  • Weight:16.82kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 418.0" x 14-1/16" x 18-13/16"( 418.0 x 358.0 x 478.0mm )

In the following sections, we will get into details in order to better understand how the SVS SB-2000 and Klipsch SPL-100 compare and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one of these subwoofers is the better choice for you.


**This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Drivers

The efficiency of a subwoofer is directly proportional to the total radiating are squared hence the woofer quantity and diameter.Both SVS SB-2000and Klipsch SPL-100 have a single woofer setup however the SVS SB-2000's woofer is 12-inch whereas the Klipsch SPL-100 features a 10-inch woofer.

Frequency Response

SB-2000 has a frequency range of 19-220 Hz whereas SPL-100 has a frequency range of 27-125 Hz. With a minimum frequency of 19Hz, the SB-2000 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the SPL-100's min frequency of 27Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Subwoofer class in our database.

Low Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

SVS SB-2000
Klipsch SPL-100
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

SVS SB-2000
Klipsch SPL-100
Min
Average
Max

Cabinet Type

The SVS SB-2000 has a Acoustic Suspension type cabinet. Acoustic Suspension aka Sealed type subwoofers have enclosures that are sealed hence no ports or holes exists on the cabinet. Sealed designs helps to provide more accurate and tight bass responses compared to ported designs. On the other hand the Klipsch SPL-100 have Bass Reflex type enclosure. Bass Reflex type subwoofers (aka Ported, Vented or Reflex Port) have enclosures that uses a port, hole or vent cut into the cabinet. Ported designs are generally more efficient than the Sealed designs.

Physical Specs

Size of a speaker can sometimes become an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare SVS SB-2000's and Klipsch SPL-100's external dimensions. SVS SB-2000 has external dimensions of 372.0 x 362.0 x 478.0mm ( 14-5/8 x 14-1/4 x 18-13/16inch) whereas Klipsch SPL-100 has external dimensions of 418.0 x 358.0 x 478.0mm ( 16-7/16 x 14-1/16 x 18-13/16inch) .

Below you can see the front view size comparison of SVS SB-2000 and Klipsch SPL-100 in scale.

SVS SB-2000 vs Klipsch SPL-100 Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of SVS SB-2000 and Klipsch SPL-100 Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the SVS SB-2000 is approximately 1730.4cm2 / 268.2inch2 and base area of the Klipsch SPL-100 is approximately 1711.2cm2 / 265.2inch2. The SB-2000 requires 1% more surface area than the SPL-100 which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a subwoofer may become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often to find the optimal positioning, also known as 'Subwoofer Crawling'. The SVS SB-2000 weighs 15.82kg / 34.8lbs and the Klipsch SPL-100 weighs 16.82kg / 37lbs. This makes the SPL-100 6% heavier than the SB-2000.

Here is a comparison of how SB-2000 and SPL-100's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Powered Subwoofer class.

Weight
All Subwoofer Speakers
SVS SB-2000
Klipsch SPL-100
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of SVS SB-2000?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of SB-2000:
  • Powered subwoofer
  • Grille
  • 8-feet AC power cord
  • Owners Manual
  • Quick Start Guide
  • What's in the Box of Klipsch SPL-100?

    Here are the items that come with the SPL-100:
  • Powered sub
  • Grille
  • 6.5-feet AC power cord
  • User Manual
  • Important Safety Instructions
  • Warranty Information

  • Reasons to choose SVS SB-2000 over Klipsch SPL-100
    Woofer Size 12 inches vs 10 inches Larger woofer
    Low Frequency Response 19 Hz vs 27 Hz Generates deeper bass
    High Frequency Response 220k Hz vs 125k Hz Generates higher frequency
    Height 372mm vs 418mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
    Reasons to choose Klipsch SPL-100 over SVS SB-2000
    Base Surface Area 1711cm2 vs 1730cm2 Takes less floor space
    Price per pair* 399USD vs 600USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)
    Wireless Operation Optional vs No Connect your subwoofer to your system wireless
    SVS SB-2000 vs Klipsch SPL-100 Specs Table
    Detailed comparison of specifications
    General SVS SB-2000 Klipsch SPL-100
    Brand SVS Klipsch
    Speaker Type Powered Subwoofer Powered Subwoofer
    Max Amplifier Output 500 watts 200 watts
    Frequency Response 19-220 Hz 27-125 Hz
    Amplifier
    Watts RMS (Continuous) 500-watt RMS 200-watt RMS
    Watts Peak (Max) n/a 450-watt RMS
    Drivers
    Woofer Quantity 1 1
    Woofer Size 12" 10"
    Woofer Composition Aluminum Cerametallic
    Tweeter Size - -
    Aimable Tweeter No No
    Midrange Driver No No
    Crossover Frequency 50-160 Hz and 80 Hz n/a
    Firing Direction front front
    Physical Specs
    Height 372.0mm (14.6") 418.0mm (16.5")
    Width 362.0mm (14.3") 358.0mm (14.1")
    Depth 478.0mm (18.8") 478.0mm (18.8")
    Weight 15.82kg (34.8lbs) 16.82kg (37lbs)
    Enclosure Acoustic Suspension Bass Reflex
    Grille Yes Yes
    Moisture Resistancy No No
    Connections
    Other
    Parts Warranty 5 Years 2 Years
    Labor Warranty 5 Years 2 Years

    Latest Powered Subwoofers
    Polk Signature Elite ES12
    Polk Signature Elite ES12
    12-inch Woofer | 22-250 Hz | 300 watts
    Polk Signature Elite ES10
    Polk Signature Elite ES10
    10-inch Woofer | 28-250 Hz | 200 watts
    Polk Signature Elite ES8
    Polk Signature Elite ES8
    8-inch Woofer | 32-180 Hz | 100 watts
    JBL Stage 220P
    JBL Stage 220P
    12-inch Woofer | 29-150 Hz | 250 watts
    JBL Stage 200P
    JBL Stage 200P
    10-inch Woofer | 32-150 Hz | 150 watts
    KEF KC92
    KEF KC92
    9-inch Woofer | 11-200 Hz | 1000 watts
    KEF Kube 15 MIE
    KEF Kube 15 MIE
    15-inch Woofer | 20-140 Hz | 300 watts
    KEF Kube 12 MIE
    KEF Kube 12 MIE
    12-inch Woofer | 22-140 Hz | 300 watts
    KEF Kube 10 MIE
    KEF Kube 10 MIE
    10-inch Woofer | 20-140 Hz | 300 watts
    KEF Kube 8 MIE
    KEF Kube 8 MIE
    8-inch Woofer | 34-140 Hz | 300 watts

    Copyright © 2025 by SpeakerDecision
    About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

    Report a Correction