SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS by TYPE
    • Passive Bookshelf Speakers
    • Passive Floor-standing Speakers
    • Passive Center Channel Speakers
    • Passive In-wall Speakers
    • All Passive Speakers
    • Powered Subwoofers
    • Powered Stereo Speakers
  • AMPLIFIERS
  • SMART FIND
Klipsch Reference Wireless RW-100SW vs Klipsch Reference R-10SWi Comparison
x
Subwoofer to replace
Change

Klipsch RW-100SW

Powered Subwoofer | 27-125 Hz

Klipsch Reference Wireless RW-100SW
CHECK PRICE
Change
    
Klipsch R-10SWi

Powered Subwoofer | 32-120 Hz

Klipsch Reference R-10SWi
CHECK PRICE
Klipsch RW-100SW Klipsch RW-100SW
See at AMAZON
Klipsch R-10SWi Klipsch R-10SWi
See at AMAZON
Klipsch RW-100SW
See at AMAZON
Klipsch R-10SWi
See at AMAZON
Klipsch RW-100SW vs Klipsch R-10SWi Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing RW-100SW and R-10SWi, two Powered Subwoofer speakers by Klipsch. Being Powered subwoofers, they both have built-in amplifiers so you don't need an external power amp or an integrated amp to power them. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Klipsch RW-100SW and Klipsch R-10SWi first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Klipsch RW-100SW Key Specs

  • 10" Copper-spun IMG Woofer
  • 27-125 Hz Frequency Response
  • 225 watts Max Amplifier Output
  • Weight:17.73kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 383.0" x 15-1/16" x 18-9/16"( 383.0 x 383.0 x 472.0mm )

Klipsch R-10SWi Key Specs

  • 10" Copper IMG Woofer
  • 32-120 Hz Frequency Response
  • 150 watts Max Amplifier Output
  • Weight:11.59kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 370.0" x 12-1/2" x 18-3/16"( 370.0 x 318.0 x 462.0mm )

In the following sections, we will get into details in order to better understand how the Klipsch RW-100SW and Klipsch R-10SWi compare and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one of these subwoofers is the better choice for you.


**This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Drivers

The efficiency of a subwoofer is directly proportional to the total radiating are squared hence the woofer quantity and diameter.Klipsch RW-100SWand Klipsch R-10SWi have the same driver set up: Both subwoofers have 1 x 10" drivers.

Frequency Response

RW-100SW has a frequency range of 27-125 Hz whereas R-10SWi has a frequency range of 32-120 Hz. With a minimum frequency of 27Hz, the RW-100SW can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the R-10SWi's min frequency of 32Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Subwoofer class in our database.

Low Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Klipsch RW-100SW
Klipsch R-10SWi
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Klipsch RW-100SW
Klipsch R-10SWi
Min
Average
Max

Cabinet Type

Both Klipsch RW-100SW and Klipsch R-10SWi have Bass Reflex type cabinets. Bass Reflex type subwoofers (aka Ported, Vented or Reflex Port) have enclosures that uses a port, hole or vent cut into the cabinet. Ported designs are generally more efficient than the Sealed designs.

Klipsch R-10SWi  Port
Klipsch R-10SWi Port

Physical Specs

Size of a speaker can sometimes become an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Klipsch RW-100SW's and Klipsch R-10SWi's external dimensions. Klipsch RW-100SW has external dimensions of 383.0 x 383.0 x 472.0mm ( 15-1/16inch x 15-1/16inch x 18-9/16inch ) whereas Klipsch R-10SWi has external dimensions of 370.0 x 318.0 x 462.0mm ( 14-9/16 x 12-1/2 x 18-3/16inch) .

Klipsch RW-100SW is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 65mm wider, 13mm taller and 10mm deeper than Klipsch R-10SWi.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Klipsch RW-100SW and Klipsch R-10SWi in scale.

Klipsch RW-100SW vs Klipsch R-10SWi Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Klipsch RW-100SW and Klipsch R-10SWi Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Klipsch RW-100SW is approximately 1807.8cm2 / 280.2inch2 and base area of the Klipsch R-10SWi is approximately 1469.2cm2 / 227.7inch2. The RW-100SW requires 23% more surface area than the R-10SWi which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a subwoofer may become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often to find the optimal positioning, also known as 'Subwoofer Crawling'. The Klipsch RW-100SW weighs 17.73kg / 39lbs and the Klipsch R-10SWi weighs 11.59kg / 25.5lbs. This makes the RW-100SW 53% heavier than the R-10SWi.

Here is a comparison of how RW-100SW and R-10SWi's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Powered Subwoofer class.

Weight
All Subwoofer Speakers
Klipsch RW-100SW
Klipsch R-10SWi
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Klipsch RW-100SW?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of RW-100SW:
  • Wireless powered sub
  • Grille (installed)
  • 5-feet AC power cord
  • User Manual
  • Important Safety Instructions
  • Warranty Information
  • What's in the Box of Klipsch R-10SWi?

    Here are the items that come with the R-10SWi:
  • Powered sub
  • Wireless transmitter (attached 12

  • Reasons to choose Klipsch Reference Wireless RW-100SW over Klipsch Reference R-10SWi
    Low Frequency Response 27 Hz vs 32 Hz Generates deeper bass
    High Frequency Response 125k Hz vs 120k Hz Generates higher frequency
    Port Position Front vs Rear Gives more flexibility placing close to walls
    Reasons to choose Klipsch Reference R-10SWi over Klipsch Reference Wireless RW-100SW
    Height 370mm vs 383mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
    Base Surface Area 1469cm2 vs 1807cm2 Takes less floor space
    Price per pair* 274USD vs 350USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)
    Klipsch RW-100SW vs Klipsch R-10SWi Specs Table
    Detailed comparison of specifications
    General Klipsch Reference Wireless RW-100SW Klipsch Reference R-10SWi
    Brand Klipsch Klipsch
    Speaker Type Powered Subwoofer Powered Subwoofer
    Max Amplifier Output 225 watts 150 watts
    Frequency Response 27-125 Hz 32-120 Hz
    Amplifier
    Watts RMS (Continuous) 225-watt RMS 150-watt RMS
    Watts Peak (Max) n/a 300-watt RMS
    Drivers
    Woofer Quantity 1 1
    Woofer Size 10" 10"
    Woofer Composition Copper-spun IMG Copper IMG
    Tweeter Size - -
    Aimable Tweeter No No
    Midrange Driver No No
    Firing Direction front rear
    Physical Specs
    Height 383.0mm (15.1") 370.0mm (14.6")
    Width 383.0mm (15.1") 318.0mm (12.5")
    Depth 472.0mm (18.6") 462.0mm (18.2")
    Weight 17.73kg (39lbs) 11.59kg (25.5lbs)
    Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
    Grille Yes Yes
    Moisture Resistancy No No
    Connections
    Other
    Parts Warranty 2 Years 2 Years
    Labor Warranty 2 Years 2 Years

    Latest Powered Subwoofers
    Polk Signature Elite ES12
    Polk Signature Elite ES12
    12-inch Woofer | 22-250 Hz | 300 watts
    Polk Signature Elite ES10
    Polk Signature Elite ES10
    10-inch Woofer | 28-250 Hz | 200 watts
    Polk Signature Elite ES8
    Polk Signature Elite ES8
    8-inch Woofer | 32-180 Hz | 100 watts
    JBL Stage 220P
    JBL Stage 220P
    12-inch Woofer | 29-150 Hz | 250 watts
    JBL Stage 200P
    JBL Stage 200P
    10-inch Woofer | 32-150 Hz | 150 watts
    KEF KC92
    KEF KC92
    9-inch Woofer | 11-200 Hz | 1000 watts
    KEF Kube 15 MIE
    KEF Kube 15 MIE
    15-inch Woofer | 20-140 Hz | 300 watts
    KEF Kube 12 MIE
    KEF Kube 12 MIE
    12-inch Woofer | 22-140 Hz | 300 watts
    KEF Kube 10 MIE
    KEF Kube 10 MIE
    10-inch Woofer | 20-140 Hz | 300 watts
    KEF Kube 8 MIE
    KEF Kube 8 MIE
    8-inch Woofer | 34-140 Hz | 300 watts

    Copyright © 2025 by SpeakerDecision
    About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

    Report a Correction