SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS by TYPE
    • Passive Bookshelf Speakers
    • Passive Floor-standing Speakers
    • Passive Center Channel Speakers
    • Passive In-wall Speakers
    • All Passive Speakers
    • Powered Subwoofers
    • Powered Stereo Speakers
  • AMPLIFIERS
  • SMART FIND
Klipsch Reference R-10SWi vs Kanto SUB8 Comparison
x
Subwoofer to replace
Change

Klipsch R-10SWi

Powered Subwoofer | 32-120 Hz

Klipsch Reference R-10SWi
CHECK PRICE
Change
    
Kanto SUB8

Powered Subwoofer | 35-175 Hz

Kanto SUB8
CHECK PRICE
Klipsch R-10SWi Klipsch R-10SWi
See at AMAZON
Kanto SUB8 Kanto SUB8
See at AMAZON
Klipsch R-10SWi
See at AMAZON
Kanto SUB8
See at AMAZON
Klipsch R-10SWi vs Kanto SUB8 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing R-10SWi and SUB8, two Powered Subwoofer speakers from Klipsch and Kanto. Being Powered subwoofers, they both have built-in amplifiers so you don't need an external power amp or an integrated amp to power them. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Klipsch R-10SWi and Kanto SUB8 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Klipsch R-10SWi Key Specs

  • 10" Copper IMG Woofer
  • 32-120 Hz Frequency Response
  • 150 watts Max Amplifier Output
  • Weight:11.59kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 370.0" x 12-1/2" x 18-3/16"( 370.0 x 318.0 x 462.0mm )

Kanto SUB8 Key Specs

  • 8" Paper Woofer
  • 35-175 Hz Frequency Response
  • 125 watts Max Amplifier Output
  • Weight:7.82kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 301.0" x 11-1/16" x 12-15/16"( 301.0 x 281.0 x 329.0mm )

In the following sections, we will get into details in order to better understand how the Klipsch R-10SWi and Kanto SUB8 compare and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one of these subwoofers is the better choice for you.


**This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Drivers

The efficiency of a subwoofer is directly proportional to the total radiating are squared hence the woofer quantity and diameter.Both Klipsch R-10SWiand Kanto SUB8 have a single woofer setup however the Klipsch R-10SWi's woofer is 10-inch whereas the Kanto SUB8 features a 8-inch woofer.

Frequency Response

R-10SWi has a frequency range of 32-120 Hz whereas SUB8 has a frequency range of 35-175 Hz. With a minimum frequency of 32Hz, the R-10SWi can go slightly deeper then the SUB8's min frequency of 35Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Subwoofer class in our database.

Low Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Klipsch R-10SWi
Kanto SUB8
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Klipsch R-10SWi
Kanto SUB8
Min
Average
Max

Cabinet Type

The Klipsch R-10SWi has a Bass Reflex type cabinet. Bass Reflex type subwoofers (aka Ported, Vented or Reflex Port) have enclosures that uses a port, hole or vent cut into the cabinet. Ported designs are generally more efficient than the Sealed designs. On the other hand the Kanto SUB8 have Acoustic Suspension type enclosure. Acoustic Suspension aka Sealed type subwoofers have enclosures that are sealed hence no ports or holes exists on the cabinet. Sealed designs helps to provide more accurate and tight bass responses compared to ported designs.

Klipsch R-10SWi  Port
Klipsch R-10SWi Port

Physical Specs

Size of a speaker can sometimes become an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Klipsch R-10SWi's and Kanto SUB8's external dimensions. Klipsch R-10SWi has external dimensions of 370.0 x 318.0 x 462.0mm ( 14-9/16 x 12-1/2 x 18-3/16inch) whereas Kanto SUB8 has external dimensions of 301.0 x 281.0 x 329.0mm ( 11-13/16 x 11-1/16 x 12-15/16inch) .

Klipsch R-10SWi is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 37mm wider, 69mm taller and 133mm deeper than Kanto SUB8.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Klipsch R-10SWi and Kanto SUB8 in scale.

Klipsch R-10SWi vs Kanto SUB8 Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Klipsch R-10SWi and Kanto SUB8 Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Klipsch R-10SWi is approximately 1469.2cm2 / 227.7inch2 and base area of the Kanto SUB8 is approximately 924.5cm2 / 143.3inch2. The R-10SWi requires 59% more surface area than the SUB8 which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a subwoofer may become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often to find the optimal positioning, also known as 'Subwoofer Crawling'. The Klipsch R-10SWi weighs 11.59kg / 25.5lbs and the Kanto SUB8 weighs 7.82kg / 17.2lbs. This makes the R-10SWi 48% heavier than the SUB8.

Here is a comparison of how R-10SWi and SUB8's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Powered Subwoofer class.

Weight
All Subwoofer Speakers
Klipsch R-10SWi
Kanto SUB8
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Klipsch R-10SWi?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of R-10SWi:
  • Powered sub
  • Wireless transmitter (attached 12
  • What's in the Box of Kanto SUB8?

    Here are the items that come with the SUB8:
  • Powered subwoofer
  • 6-feet AC power cord
  • 9.75-feet mono-RCA cable
  • User Manual

  • Reasons to choose Klipsch Reference R-10SWi over Kanto SUB8
    Woofer Size 10 inches vs 8 inches Larger woofer
    Low Frequency Response 32 Hz vs 35 Hz Generates deeper bass
    Price per pair* 274USD vs 300USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)
    Wireless Operation Yes vs No Connect your subwoofer to your system wireless
    Reasons to choose Kanto SUB8 over Klipsch Reference R-10SWi
    High Frequency Response 175k Hz vs 120k Hz Generates higher frequency
    Port Position Front vs Rear Gives more flexibility placing close to walls
    Height 301mm vs 370mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
    Base Surface Area 924cm2 vs 1469cm2 Takes less floor space
    Klipsch R-10SWi vs Kanto SUB8 Specs Table
    Detailed comparison of specifications
    General Klipsch Reference R-10SWi Kanto SUB8
    Brand Klipsch Kanto
    Speaker Type Powered Subwoofer Powered Subwoofer
    Max Amplifier Output 150 watts 125 watts
    Frequency Response 32-120 Hz 35-175 Hz
    Amplifier
    Watts RMS (Continuous) 150-watt RMS 125-watt RMS
    Watts Peak (Max) 300-watt RMS 250-watt RMS
    Drivers
    Woofer Quantity 1 1
    Woofer Size 10" 8"
    Woofer Composition Copper IMG Paper
    Tweeter Size - -
    Aimable Tweeter No No
    Midrange Driver No No
    Firing Direction rear front
    Physical Specs
    Height 370.0mm (14.6") 301.0mm (11.9")
    Width 318.0mm (12.5") 281.0mm (11.1")
    Depth 462.0mm (18.2") 329.0mm (13")
    Weight 11.59kg (25.5lbs) 7.82kg (17.2lbs)
    Enclosure Bass Reflex Acoustic Suspension
    Grille Yes n/a
    Moisture Resistancy No No
    Connections
    Other
    Parts Warranty 2 Years 2 Years
    Labor Warranty 2 Years 2 Years

    Latest Powered Subwoofers
    Polk Signature Elite ES12
    Polk Signature Elite ES12
    12-inch Woofer | 22-250 Hz | 300 watts
    Polk Signature Elite ES10
    Polk Signature Elite ES10
    10-inch Woofer | 28-250 Hz | 200 watts
    Polk Signature Elite ES8
    Polk Signature Elite ES8
    8-inch Woofer | 32-180 Hz | 100 watts
    JBL Stage 220P
    JBL Stage 220P
    12-inch Woofer | 29-150 Hz | 250 watts
    JBL Stage 200P
    JBL Stage 200P
    10-inch Woofer | 32-150 Hz | 150 watts
    KEF KC92
    KEF KC92
    9-inch Woofer | 11-200 Hz | 1000 watts
    KEF Kube 15 MIE
    KEF Kube 15 MIE
    15-inch Woofer | 20-140 Hz | 300 watts
    KEF Kube 12 MIE
    KEF Kube 12 MIE
    12-inch Woofer | 22-140 Hz | 300 watts
    KEF Kube 10 MIE
    KEF Kube 10 MIE
    10-inch Woofer | 20-140 Hz | 300 watts
    KEF Kube 8 MIE
    KEF Kube 8 MIE
    8-inch Woofer | 34-140 Hz | 300 watts

    Copyright © 2025 by SpeakerDecision
    About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

    Report a Correction