SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS by TYPE
    • Passive Bookshelf Speakers
    • Passive Floor-standing Speakers
    • Passive Center Channel Speakers
    • Passive In-wall Speakers
    • All Passive Speakers
    • Powered Subwoofers
    • Powered Stereo Speakers
  • AMPLIFIERS
  • SMART FIND
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400SW vs Revel Performa3 B112v2 Comparison
x
Subwoofer to replace
Change

Klipsch RP-1400SW

Powered Subwoofer | 16-141 Hz

Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400SW
CHECK PRICE
Change
    
Revel Performa3 B112v2

Powered Subwoofer | 29-150 Hz

Revel Performa3 B112v2
CHECK PRICE
Klipsch RP-1400SW Klipsch RP-1400SW
See at AMAZON
Revel Performa3 B112v2 Revel Performa3 B112...
See at AMAZON
Klipsch RP-1400SW
See at AMAZON
Revel Performa3 B112...
See at AMAZON
Klipsch RP-1400SW vs Revel Performa3 B112v2 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing RP-1400SW and Performa3 B112v2, two Powered Subwoofer speakers from Klipsch and Revel. Being Powered subwoofers, they both have built-in amplifiers so you don't need an external power amp or an integrated amp to power them. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Klipsch RP-1400SW and Revel Performa3 B112v2 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Klipsch RP-1400SW Key Specs

  • 14" Cerametallic Woofer
  • 16-141 Hz Frequency Response
  • 500 watts Max Amplifier Output
  • Weight:38.05kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 542.0" x 20" x 25-11/16"( 542.0 x 508.0 x 653.0mm )

Revel Performa3 B112v2 Key Specs

  • 12" Coated Paper/Pulp Woofer
  • 29-150 Hz Frequency Response
  • 1000 watts Max Amplifier Output
  • Weight:29.45kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 469.0" x 15-15/16" x 18-9/16"( 469.0 x 405.0 x 472.0mm )

In the following sections, we will get into details in order to better understand how the Klipsch RP-1400SW and Revel Performa3 B112v2 compare and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one of these subwoofers is the better choice for you.


**This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Drivers

The efficiency of a subwoofer is directly proportional to the total radiating are squared hence the woofer quantity and diameter.Both Klipsch RP-1400SWand Revel Performa3 B112v2 have a single woofer setup however the Klipsch RP-1400SW's woofer is 14-inch whereas the Revel Performa3 B112v2 features a 12-inch woofer.

Frequency Response

RP-1400SW has a frequency range of 16-141 Hz whereas Performa3 B112v2 has a frequency range of 29-150 Hz. With a minimum frequency of 16Hz, the RP-1400SW can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the Performa3 B112v2's min frequency of 29Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Subwoofer class in our database.

Low Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Klipsch RP-1400SW
Revel Performa3 B112v2
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Klipsch RP-1400SW
Revel Performa3 B112v2
Min
Average
Max

Cabinet Type

The Klipsch RP-1400SW has a Bass Reflex type cabinet. Bass Reflex type subwoofers (aka Ported, Vented or Reflex Port) have enclosures that uses a port, hole or vent cut into the cabinet. Ported designs are generally more efficient than the Sealed designs. On the other hand the Revel Performa3 B112v2 have Acoustic Suspension type enclosure. Acoustic Suspension aka Sealed type subwoofers have enclosures that are sealed hence no ports or holes exists on the cabinet. Sealed designs helps to provide more accurate and tight bass responses compared to ported designs.

Physical Specs

Size of a speaker can sometimes become an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Klipsch RP-1400SW's and Revel Performa3 B112v2's external dimensions. Klipsch RP-1400SW has external dimensions of 542.0 x 508.0 x 653.0mm ( 21-5/16inch x 20inch x 25-11/16inch ) whereas Revel Performa3 B112v2 has external dimensions of 469.0 x 405.0 x 472.0mm ( 18-7/16inch x 15-15/16inch x 18-9/16inch ) .

Klipsch RP-1400SW is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 103mm wider, 73mm taller and 181mm deeper than Revel Performa3 B112v2.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Klipsch RP-1400SW and Revel Performa3 B112v2 in scale.

Klipsch RP-1400SW vs Revel Performa3 B112v2 Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Klipsch RP-1400SW and Revel Performa3 B112v2 Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Klipsch RP-1400SW is approximately 3317.2cm2 / 514.2inch2 and base area of the Revel Performa3 B112v2 is approximately 1911.6cm2 / 296.3inch2. The RP-1400SW requires 74% more surface area than the Performa3 B112v2 which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a subwoofer may become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often to find the optimal positioning, also known as 'Subwoofer Crawling'. The Klipsch RP-1400SW weighs 38.05kg / 83.7lbs and the Revel Performa3 B112v2 weighs 29.45kg / 64.8lbs. This makes the RP-1400SW 29% heavier than the Performa3 B112v2.

Here is a comparison of how RP-1400SW and Performa3 B112v2's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Powered Subwoofer class.

Weight
All Subwoofer Speakers
Klipsch RP-1400SW
Revel Performa3 B112v2
Min
Average
Max

Reasons to choose Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400SW over Revel Performa3 B112v2
Woofer Size 14 inches vs 12 inches Larger woofer
Low Frequency Response 16 Hz vs 29 Hz Generates deeper bass
Price per pair* 1399USD vs 2695USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)
Wireless Operation Optional vs No Connect your subwoofer to your system wireless
Reasons to choose Revel Performa3 B112v2 over Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400SW
High Frequency Response 150k Hz vs 141k Hz Generates higher frequency
Height 469mm vs 542mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 1911cm2 vs 3317cm2 Takes less floor space
Klipsch RP-1400SW vs Revel Performa3 B112v2 Specs Table
Detailed comparison of specifications
General Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400SW Revel Performa3 B112v2
Brand Klipsch Revel
Speaker Type Powered Subwoofer Powered Subwoofer
Max Amplifier Output 500 watts 1000 watts
Frequency Response 16-141 Hz 29-150 Hz
Amplifier
Watts RMS (Continuous) 500-watt RMS 1000-watt RMS
Watts Peak (Max) 1000-watt RMS n/a
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 1 1
Woofer Size 14" 12"
Woofer Composition Cerametallic Coated Paper/Pulp
Tweeter Size - -
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No No
Firing Direction front front
Physical Specs
Height 542.0mm (21.3") 469.0mm (18.5")
Width 508.0mm (20") 405.0mm (15.9")
Depth 653.0mm (25.7") 472.0mm (18.6")
Weight 38.05kg (83.7lbs) 29.45kg (64.8lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Acoustic Suspension
Finish MDF with Vinyl n/a
Available Colors Ebony n/a
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Other
Parts Warranty 5 years 5 Years
Labor Warranty 5 years 5 Years

Latest Powered Subwoofers
Polk Signature Elite ES12
Polk Signature Elite ES12
12-inch Woofer | 22-250 Hz | 300 watts
Polk Signature Elite ES10
Polk Signature Elite ES10
10-inch Woofer | 28-250 Hz | 200 watts
Polk Signature Elite ES8
Polk Signature Elite ES8
8-inch Woofer | 32-180 Hz | 100 watts
JBL Stage 220P
JBL Stage 220P
12-inch Woofer | 29-150 Hz | 250 watts
JBL Stage 200P
JBL Stage 200P
10-inch Woofer | 32-150 Hz | 150 watts
KEF KC92
KEF KC92
9-inch Woofer | 11-200 Hz | 1000 watts
KEF Kube 15 MIE
KEF Kube 15 MIE
15-inch Woofer | 20-140 Hz | 300 watts
KEF Kube 12 MIE
KEF Kube 12 MIE
12-inch Woofer | 22-140 Hz | 300 watts
KEF Kube 10 MIE
KEF Kube 10 MIE
10-inch Woofer | 20-140 Hz | 300 watts
KEF Kube 8 MIE
KEF Kube 8 MIE
8-inch Woofer | 34-140 Hz | 300 watts

Copyright © 2025 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction