SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS by TYPE
    • Passive Bookshelf Speakers
    • Passive Floor-standing Speakers
    • Passive Center Channel Speakers
    • Passive In-wall Speakers
    • All Passive Speakers
    • Powered Subwoofers
    • Powered Stereo Speakers
  • AMPLIFIERS
  • SMART FIND
KEF KC62 vs Klipsch Reference R-10SWi Comparison
x
Subwoofer to replace
Change

KEF KC62

Powered Subwoofer | 11-200 Hz

KEF KC62
CHECK PRICE
Change
    
Klipsch R-10SWi

Powered Subwoofer | 32-120 Hz

Klipsch Reference R-10SWi
CHECK PRICE
KEF KC62 KEF KC62
See at AMAZON
Klipsch R-10SWi Klipsch R-10SWi
See at AMAZON
KEF KC62
See at AMAZON
Klipsch R-10SWi
See at AMAZON
KEF KC62 vs Klipsch R-10SWi Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing KC62 and R-10SWi, two Powered Subwoofer speakers from KEF and Klipsch. Being Powered subwoofers, they both have built-in amplifiers so you don't need an external power amp or an integrated amp to power them. Let's have a brief look at the main features of KEF KC62 and Klipsch R-10SWi first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

KEF KC62 Key Specs

  • 2 x 6.5" Woofer
  • 11-200 Hz Frequency Response
  • 1000 watts Max Amplifier Output
  • Weight:14.05kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 245.0" x 10-1/8" x 11-1/16"( 245.0 x 258.0 x 281.0mm )

Klipsch R-10SWi Key Specs

  • 10" Copper IMG Woofer
  • 32-120 Hz Frequency Response
  • 150 watts Max Amplifier Output
  • Weight:11.59kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 370.0" x 12-1/2" x 18-3/16"( 370.0 x 318.0 x 462.0mm )

In the following sections, we will get into details in order to better understand how the KEF KC62 and Klipsch R-10SWi compare and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one of these subwoofers is the better choice for you.


**This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Drivers

The efficiency of a subwoofer is directly proportional to the total radiating are squared hence the woofer quantity and diameter.KEF KC62 and Klipsch R-10SWi have a totally different setup: the KEF KC62 features 2 x 6.5-inch drivers whereas the R-10SWi features 1 x 10-inch drivers.

Frequency Response

KC62 has a frequency range of 11-200 Hz whereas R-10SWi has a frequency range of 32-120 Hz. With a minimum frequency of 11Hz, the KC62 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the R-10SWi's min frequency of 32Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Subwoofer class in our database.

Low Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

KEF KC62
Klipsch R-10SWi
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

KEF KC62
Klipsch R-10SWi
Min
Average
Max

Cabinet Type

The KEF KC62 has a Acoustic Suspension type cabinet. Acoustic Suspension aka Sealed type subwoofers have enclosures that are sealed hence no ports or holes exists on the cabinet. Sealed designs helps to provide more accurate and tight bass responses compared to ported designs. On the other hand the Klipsch R-10SWi have Bass Reflex type enclosure. Bass Reflex type subwoofers (aka Ported, Vented or Reflex Port) have enclosures that uses a port, hole or vent cut into the cabinet. Ported designs are generally more efficient than the Sealed designs.

Klipsch R-10SWi  Port
Klipsch R-10SWi Port

Physical Specs

Size of a speaker can sometimes become an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare KEF KC62's and Klipsch R-10SWi's external dimensions. KEF KC62 has external dimensions of 245.0 x 258.0 x 281.0mm ( 9-5/8inch x 10-1/8inch x 11-1/16inch ) whereas Klipsch R-10SWi has external dimensions of 370.0 x 318.0 x 462.0mm ( 14-9/16 x 12-1/2 x 18-3/16inch) .

Klipsch R-10SWi is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 60mm wider, 125mm taller and 181mm deeper than KEF KC62.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of KEF KC62 and Klipsch R-10SWi in scale.

KEF KC62 vs Klipsch R-10SWi Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of KEF KC62 and Klipsch R-10SWi Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the KEF KC62 is approximately 725.0cm2 / 112.4inch2 and base area of the Klipsch R-10SWi is approximately 1469.2cm2 / 227.7inch2. The KC62 requires 51% less surface area than the R-10SWi which gives it a small advantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a subwoofer may become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often to find the optimal positioning, also known as 'Subwoofer Crawling'. The KEF KC62 weighs 14.05kg / 30.9lbs and the Klipsch R-10SWi weighs 11.59kg / 25.5lbs. This makes the KC62 21% heavier than the R-10SWi.

Here is a comparison of how KC62 and R-10SWi's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Powered Subwoofer class.

Weight
All Subwoofer Speakers
KEF KC62
Klipsch R-10SWi
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of KEF KC62?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of KC62:
  • Powered subwoofer
  • 6.5-feet AC power cord
  • Speaker-level input block
  • User Manual
  • Important Safety Information
  • Warranty Information
  • What's in the Box of Klipsch R-10SWi?

    Here are the items that come with the R-10SWi:
  • Powered sub
  • Wireless transmitter (attached 12

  • Reasons to choose KEF KC62 over Klipsch Reference R-10SWi
    Number of Woofers 2 vs 1 More woofers
    Low Frequency Response 11 Hz vs 32 Hz Generates deeper bass
    High Frequency Response 200k Hz vs 120k Hz Generates higher frequency
    Height 245mm vs 370mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
    Base Surface Area 725cm2 vs 1469cm2 Takes less floor space
    Reasons to choose Klipsch Reference R-10SWi over KEF KC62
    Woofer Size 10 inches vs 6.5 inches Larger woofer
    Price per pair* 274USD vs 1500USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)
    KEF KC62 vs Klipsch R-10SWi Specs Table
    Detailed comparison of specifications
    General KEF KC62 Klipsch Reference R-10SWi
    Brand KEF Klipsch
    Speaker Type Powered Subwoofer Powered Subwoofer
    Max Amplifier Output 1000 watts 150 watts
    Frequency Response 11-200 Hz 32-120 Hz
    Amplifier
    Watts RMS (Continuous) 1000-watt RMS 150-watt RMS
    Watts Peak (Max) n/a 300-watt RMS
    Drivers
    Woofer Quantity 2 1
    Woofer Size 6.5" 10"
    Woofer Composition Copper IMG
    Tweeter Size - -
    Aimable Tweeter No No
    Midrange Driver No No
    Firing Direction side rear
    Physical Specs
    Height 245.0mm (9.6") 370.0mm (14.6")
    Width 258.0mm (10.2") 318.0mm (12.5")
    Depth 281.0mm (11.1") 462.0mm (18.2")
    Weight 14.05kg (30.9lbs) 11.59kg (25.5lbs)
    Enclosure Acoustic Suspension Bass Reflex
    Grille n/a Yes
    Moisture Resistancy No No
    Connections
    Other
    Parts Warranty 2 Years 2 Years
    Labor Warranty 2 Years 2 Years

    Latest Powered Subwoofers
    Polk Signature Elite ES12
    Polk Signature Elite ES12
    12-inch Woofer | 22-250 Hz | 300 watts
    Polk Signature Elite ES10
    Polk Signature Elite ES10
    10-inch Woofer | 28-250 Hz | 200 watts
    Polk Signature Elite ES8
    Polk Signature Elite ES8
    8-inch Woofer | 32-180 Hz | 100 watts
    JBL Stage 220P
    JBL Stage 220P
    12-inch Woofer | 29-150 Hz | 250 watts
    JBL Stage 200P
    JBL Stage 200P
    10-inch Woofer | 32-150 Hz | 150 watts
    KEF KC92
    KEF KC92
    9-inch Woofer | 11-200 Hz | 1000 watts
    KEF Kube 15 MIE
    KEF Kube 15 MIE
    15-inch Woofer | 20-140 Hz | 300 watts
    KEF Kube 12 MIE
    KEF Kube 12 MIE
    12-inch Woofer | 22-140 Hz | 300 watts
    KEF Kube 10 MIE
    KEF Kube 10 MIE
    10-inch Woofer | 20-140 Hz | 300 watts
    KEF Kube 8 MIE
    KEF Kube 8 MIE
    8-inch Woofer | 34-140 Hz | 300 watts

    Copyright © 2025 by SpeakerDecision
    About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

    Report a Correction